I struggle each time when deciding which topics to speak about
in these bimonthly Regional Art Junkie articles. There are
a lot of potential subjects, and the opportunity to write does
not come frequently enough to allow an ongoing exploration of the
many and varied subjects that might fit these monologues. And
then I always question my own expertise and point of view, knowing
that there are always differing opinions, and even some people
out there just itching for a contrary fight. (It is also
quite easy to recognize that few people actually read the Junkie
so any sense of self importance is quickly squelched by the probability
that what I may choose to address will have little impact.)
But for the two of you who do read this, let me ask pardon if
I tend to be too didactic and plain old “preachy”. After
all, I am one who still appreciates platitudes in an age when so
many events and ideas compete in rushed brief time and when meaningful
conversation and ideas are so fleeting. Give me a solid nugget
of an idea to repeat anytime while around us we are bombarded by
propaganda, diverse competing ideas and the never ending flood
of commercial advertisements. In these days we tend to ignore
and protect ourselves from most of what is thrown at us, including
that which is very significant. As we hunker down and in
order to protect our sanity we fail to listen well enough to all
the voices.
So…let me decide this time to speak briefly about a voice
no longer with us. James Auer (1928–2004) former art critic
for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, a recipient of a 2005 Wisconsin
Visual Art Lifetime Achievement Award, was a man who shared the
center of our regional art culture. WP&S still
thinks of him as an arts figure important enough to have the Wisconsin
Artists Biennial title its First Place award after him. This
was done to memorialize Jim and to repeatedly return our attention
to someone who played an integral role in our State’s visual
arts community. Maybe repeated acknowledgments of him, and
some others, will help us to focus on those around us today who
figure importantly into our contemporary art affairs.
Jim spent most of his professional life in Wisconsin, and a good
part of that in the greater Milwaukee area, tending to his deep
interest in the art culture of our community. If he had an
agenda or preferences or biases, he did a great job of disguising
them. He not only pointed out art making that was progressive
produced both within and without our state, but he also paid attention
to the activities of the supporting enduring community of artists
who form the skeletal structure of our cultural body. He
seemed to understand that the activities of our local artists and
galleries were an essential part of the life blood that strengthened
our art culture, which informed that community and which energized
the essential underlying structure holding this body upright. It
should be argued that Jim was an integral organ of the community,
not separated from it or imposed upon it.
I think he knew that the visible discussion of our regional art
served him in an important way. It helped insure that there
was a body of readers who paid attention, who were convinced that
there was an art community of importance, and it helped insure
him of a job.
He often spoke about what some others might consider to be local
and humble, including exhibits and artists that were not of obvious
consequence, while he also informed us of exhibits from outside
our regional comfort zone, pointing out new trends, discussing
personalities and events that were topical and significant. Jim
had decades to learn from us, about us, and to inform us. He
knew us very well, and for the most part we believed he understood
and respected our artist community.
Of course, what we remember now about him are the things that
seem most meaningful in hindsight. During his tenure we complained
enough to him about lack of coverage and we expressed our differences
of opinion. On a couple of occasions I witnessed Jim’s
frustration, and even some anger, when he was besieged by the many
who wanted his attention, who wanted him to report on their exhibit
and to champion their causes. He said more than once that
he would always be criticized because he was not everywhere doing
everything we wanted him to do. He simply could not find
the time and column space necessary permitting him to follow up
on all that stuff.
But what we now see thru our 20-20 hindsight is that he did pay
attention to “us” and write considerably about “us”. He
had an appreciation of our roles in the regional community, and
he carried our banners to battle often enough.
Was he too close to us? Did he fail to probe and prick and
criticize and tell us where he thought we had gone wrong? I
think not, though to his credit, he was gentle with his words. He
meted them out carefully when there was something he did not find
favorable, or he simply did not comment at all, this being a measure
of his disinterest and disfavor. He was no bully. He
was no bomb thrower. He was a gentleman who understood the
importance of a vital local varied art culture with its highbrows,
lowbrows, characters and stalwarts.
Thanks to the Wisconsin Visual Art Lifetime Achievement Award
that Jim received posthumously, and the naming of the first award
in the Wisconsin Artists Biennial in his name, we have a recurrent
chance to remember and honor Jim Auer. Hopefully, by memorializing
him we gain a better sensitivity to those around us who are doing
good things for our regional visual arts today. By his example
perhaps we are better able to compare and judge others who are
currently involved in the art scene.
Unfortunately Jim was another case of not knowing what we have
until it’s gone.
To quote a member of the band for the famous country singer, Hank
Williams, "A legend doesn't look like a legend when he's
being made. He looks just like people".
I can’t say that Jim is yet a legend, but I can say he is
missed by many of us who appreciated his attitude and how he carried
out his role among us.
Back to Compositions |